Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.
Pin Bonuses Percentage
So far this is incorrect. Pin Bonuses remains more succinct and clearer. The pricing mechanics page would need to make a giant leap forward in usability and concision in order for it to be a viable substitute HolmesIV (talk) 04:08, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Please list specific complaints regarding Pricing Mechanics. Pin Bonus Percentages is incorrect or incomplete in many aspects - some of its contents is outright false. --CyberShadow (talk) 22:05, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Cybershadow is absolutely right. Pin Bonus Percentages is made completely useless by Pricing Mechanics , and is often not correct information to begin with. I think the problem is some people don't want to understand "why" or "how" the things work, they just want the chart to tell them what to do and are scared away from Pricing Mechanics before they get down to there. Maybe add a preface to Pricing Mechanics saying something like, "If you just want the chart, skip to the Strategy section." In any case, everything that Pin Bonus has is inaccurate, and Pricing Mechanics has it in an acurate version, and also has information explaining the mechanics. OrbitalBliss (talk) 17:54, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
- I've added a Pricing Strategies page for the strategies that were included on the Pricing Mechanics page, and removed the Strategy section from Pricing Mechanics as well. Also added a preface to the Pricing Mechanics linking to Pricing Strategies and vice versa. Pricing Strategies is also on the front-page now too. I will see if I can create a printable table on Google Docs to link into the page as well later. Before I delete this page I'd like to see feedback on these changes, and see if I understood the problem correctly. Joshrl (talk) 13:44, December 4, 2014 (UTC)